Jake had his follow-up with the ophthalmologist this morning. Quoth the doctor, “He's fine.”
I do not want one of these: www.xentex.com. For one thing, it costs $5000. For another, it weighs twelve pounds. I suppose there might be people out in the world who are desperate for a dual-display notebook computer, but I'm not one of them.
(The Xentex site has one of those annoying Flash intro pages. I'm baffled as to why companies insist on throwing roadblocks like this in front of people who just want to visit their web site. It sends potential customers the message, We don't care why you came here, you will watch a commercial before we let you in.)
Haven't heard much about yesterday's elections, other than that the Republicans have taken Congress. (One imagines Republicans marching into the House & Senate chambers like Nazis into Paris.)
There's a Coke machine just down the hall from my office. It has six buttons, all labeled 'Coke'. It hasn't been restocked in quite a while, so the first three buttons report Sold Out when pressed. To get a can of Coke, you must press the fourth button labeled 'Coke'.
Duh.
It's too bad the machine doesn't know that all it has is Coke, so pressing any button could work so long as there are any cans left.
Hill Ford says, “No, the Check Engine light doesn't come on for scheduled maintenance. Better bring it in. How about Friday?”
Now is not a good time for expensive car repairs....
The Mozilla bugs database, which last November celebrated its 100,000th bug, is rapidly approaching bug number 200,000. Over on Slashdot, an apologist points out:
NOTE: Although almost 200,000 bugs have been reported, there are not—and have not been—that many bugs in Mozilla.
These are the people who got all worked up over the size of Microsoft's Windows bugs database, which—as of February, 2000—contained 65,000 bugs.
The number of records in the database doesn't matter as much as the number of actual bugs, and their severity. I've used Windows 2000 more than I've used Mozilla, but neither has given me much trouble.
Re-read my XHTML book & decided that <div> was more appropriate than <span>, so updated my CityDesk templates to use it.
I've had bad results with <div> before—in particular, Netscape 4.7x breaks badly when confronted with two of them arranged side-by-side. One hopes the current design won't tickle that particular Netscape bug. I'd hate to disappoint the loyal readership.
My public, how they adore me.
HTML Tidy no longer finds much to complain about in these pages, except for a few hundred
<caption> attribute "align" has invalid value "bottom"
...but I respectfully disagree with its judgment.
Now to dump everything to a CD for later uploading. Maybe I'll upload it to the Pair.com server & see how it works there. (It could hardly work worse than EarthLink's web server....)